Critical Patches Issued for Microsoft Products, November 12, 2024
- by nlqip
MS-ISAC ADVISORY NUMBER:
2024-125
DATE(S) ISSUED:
11/12/2024
OVERVIEW:
Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in Microsoft products, the most severe of which could allow for remote code execution in the context of the logged on user. Depending on the privileges associated with the user, an attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. Users whose accounts are configured to have fewer user rights on the system could be less impacted than those who operate with administrative user rights.
THREAT INTELLIGENCE:
There are currently no reports of these vulnerabilities being exploited in the wild.
SYSTEMS AFFECTED:
- SQL Server
- Microsoft Virtual Hard Drive
- Windows SMBv3 Client/Server
- Windows USB Video Driver
- Microsoft Windows DNS
- Windows NTLM
- Windows Registry
- .NET and Visual Studio
- Windows Update Stack
- LightGBM
- Azure CycleCloud
- Azure Database for PostgreSQL
- Windows Telephony Service
- Windows NT OS Kernel
- Role: Windows Hyper-V
- Windows VMSwitch
- Windows DWM Core Library
- Windows Kernel
- Windows Secure Kernel Mode
- Windows Kerberos
- Windows SMB
- Windows CSC Service
- Windows Defender Application Control (WDAC)
- Windows Active Directory Certificate Services
- Microsoft Office Excel
- Microsoft Graphics Component
- Microsoft Office Word
- Windows Task Scheduler
- Microsoft Exchange Server
- Visual Studio
- Windows Win32 Kernel Subsystem
- TorchGeo
- Visual Sudio Code
- Microsoft PC Manager
- Airlift.microsoft.com
RISK:
Government:
Large and medium government entitiesHIGH
Small governmentMEDIUM
Businesses:
Large and medium business entitiesHIGH
Small business entitiesMEDIUM
TECHNICAL SUMMARY:
Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in Microsoft products, the most severe of which could allow for remote code execution.
A full list of all vulnerabilities can be found in the Microsoft link in the References section.
Successful exploitation of the most severe of these vulnerabilities could result in an attacker gaining the same privileges as the logged-on user. Depending on the privileges associated with the user, an attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. Users whose accounts are configured to have fewer user rights on the system could be less impacted than those who operate with administrative user rights.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
We recommend the following actions be taken:
- Apply appropriate patches or appropriate mitigations provided by Microsoft to vulnerable systems immediately after appropriate testing. (M1051: Update Software)
- Safeguard 7.1: Establish and Maintain a Vulnerability Management Process: Establish and maintain a documented vulnerability management process for enterprise assets. Review and update documentation annually, or when significant enterprise changes occur that could impact this Safeguard.
- Safeguard 7.4: Perform Automated Application Patch Management: Perform application updates on enterprise assets through automated patch management on a monthly, or more frequent, basis.
- Apply the Principle of Least Privilege to all systems and services, and run all software as a non-privileged user (one without administrative rights) to diminish the effects of a successful attack. (M1026: Privileged Account Management)
- Safeguard 4.7: Manage Default Accounts on Enterprise Assets and Software: Manage default accounts on enterprise assets and software, such as root, administrator, and other pre-configured vendor accounts. Example implementations can include: disabling default accounts or making them unusable.
- Safeguard 5.4: Restrict Administrator Privileges to Dedicated Administrator Accounts: Restrict administrator privileges to dedicated administrator accounts on enterprise assets. Conduct general computing activities, such as internet browsing, email, and productivity suite use, from the user’s primary, non-privileged account.
- Remind all users not to visit untrusted websites or follow links/open files provided by unknown or untrusted sources. (M1017: User Training)
- Safeguard 14.1: Establish and Maintain a Security Awareness Program: Establish and maintain a security awareness program. The purpose of a security awareness program is to educate the enterprise’s workforce on how to interact with enterprise assets and data in a secure manner. Conduct training at hire and, at a minimum, annually. Review and update content annually, or when significant enterprise changes occur that could impact this Safeguard.
- Safeguard 14.2: Train Workforce Members to Recognize Social Engineering Attacks: Train workforce members to recognize social engineering attacks, such as phishing, pre-texting, and tailgating.
- Use capabilities to prevent suspicious behavior patterns from occurring on endpoint systems. This could include suspicious process, file, API call, etc. behavior. (M1040 : Behavior Prevention on Endpoint)
- Safeguard 13.2 : Deploy a Host-Based Intrusion Detection Solution: Deploy a host-based intrusion detection solution on enterprise assets, where appropriate and/or supported.
- Safeguard 13.7 : Deploy a Host-Based Intrusion Prevention Solution: Deploy a host-based intrusion prevention solution on enterprise assets, where appropriate and/or supported. Example implementations include use of an Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) client or host-based IPS agent.
Source link
lol
MS-ISAC ADVISORY NUMBER: 2024-125 DATE(S) ISSUED: 11/12/2024 OVERVIEW: Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in Microsoft products, the most severe of which could allow for remote code execution in the context of the logged on user. Depending on the privileges associated with the user, an attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or…
Recent Posts
- Microsoft disrupts ONNX phishing-as-a-service infrastructure
- Five Cyber Agencies Sound Alarm About Active Directory Attacks: Beyond the Basics
- CISA Adds Three Known Exploited Vulnerabilities to Catalog | CISA
- Active Directory Under Attack: Five Eyes Guidance Targets Crucial Security Gaps
- ‘Google Must Divest Chrome,’ Possibly Android, Says DOJ; Google Fires Back