A Vulnerability in Cisco Secure Email Gateway Could Allow for Remote Code Execution
- by nlqip
MS-ISAC ADVISORY NUMBER:
2024-083
DATE(S) ISSUED:
07/22/2024
OVERVIEW:
A vulnerability has been discovered in Cisco Secure Email Gateway that could allow for remote code execution. Cisco Secure Email Gateway is an email security product that uses signature analysis and machine learning to identify and block malicious emails before they reach recipients inboxes. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to replace any file on the underlying file system. The attacker could then perform any of the following actions: add users with root privileges, modify the device configuration, execute arbitrary code, or cause a permanent denial of service (DoS) condition on the affected device.
THREAT INTELLIGENCE:
There are no reports of this vulnerability being exploited in the wild.
SYSTEMS AFFECTED:
- Content Scanner Tools versions earlier then 23.3.0.4823 if either the file analysis feature, which is part of Cisco Advanced Malware Protection (AMP), or the content filter feature is enabled and assigned to an incoming mail policy
RISK:
Government:
Large and medium government entitiesHIGH
Small governmentMEDIUM
Businesses:
Large and medium business entitiesHIGH
Small business entitiesMEDIUM
TECHNICAL SUMMARY:
A vulnerability has been discovered in Cisco Secure Email Gateway that could allow for remote code execution. Details of the vulnerability include:
Tactic: Initial Access (TA0001):
Technique: Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190):
- A vulnerability in the content scanning and message filtering features of Cisco Secure Email Gateway could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to overwrite arbitrary files on the underlying operating system. This vulnerability is due to improper handling of email attachments when file analysis and content filters are enabled. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending an email that contains a crafted attachment through an affected device.
Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to replace any file on the underlying file system. The attacker could then perform any of the following actions: add users with root privileges, modify the device configuration, execute arbitrary code, or cause a permanent denial of service (DoS) condition on the affected device.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
We recommend the following actions be taken:
- Apply appropriate mitigations provided by Cisco to vulnerable systems immediately after appropriate testing. (M1051: Update Software)
- Safeguard 7.1: Establish and Maintain a Vulnerability Management Process: Establish and maintain a documented vulnerability management process for enterprise assets. Review and update documentation annually, or when significant enterprise changes occur that could impact this Safeguard.
- Safeguard 7.4: Perform Automated Application Patch Management: Perform application updates on enterprise assets through automated patch management on a monthly, or more frequent, basis.
- Safeguard 7.6: Perform Automated Vulnerability Scans of Externally-Exposed Enterprise Assets: Perform automated vulnerability scans of externally-exposed enterprise assets using a SCAP-compliant vulnerability scanning tool. Perform scans on a monthly, or more frequent, basis.
- Safeguard 7.7: Remediate Detected Vulnerabilities: Remediate detected vulnerabilities in software through processes and tooling on a monthly, or more frequent, basis, based on the remediation process.
- Apply the Principle of Least Privilege to all systems and services. Run all software as a non-privileged user (one without administrative privileges) to diminish the effects of a successful attack. (M1026: Privileged Account Management)
- Safeguard 4.7: Manage Default Accounts on Enterprise Assets and Software: Manage default accounts on enterprise assets and software, such as root, administrator, and other pre-configured vendor accounts. Example implementations can include: disabling default accounts or making them unusable.
- Safeguard 5.4: Restrict Administrator Privileges to Dedicated Administrator Accounts: Restrict administrator privileges to dedicated administrator accounts on enterprise assets. Conduct general computing activities, such as internet browsing, email, and productivity suite use, from the user’s primary, non-privileged account.
- Prevent access to file shares, remote access to systems, unnecessary services. Mechanisms to limit access may include use of network concentrators, RDP gateways, etc. (M1035: Limit Access to Resource Over Network)
- Use intrusion detection signatures to block traffic at network boundaries. (M1031: Network Intrusion Prevention)
- Safeguard 13.3: Deploy a Network Intrusion Detection Solution: Deploy a network intrusion detection solution on enterprise assets, where appropriate. Example implementations include the use of a Network Intrusion Detection System (NIDS) or equivalent cloud service provider (CSP) service.
- Safeguard 13.8: Deploy a Network Intrusion Prevention Solution: Deploy a network intrusion prevention solution, where appropriate. Example implementations include the use of a Network Intrusion Prevention System (NIPS) or equivalent CSP service.
- Use capabilities to detect and block conditions that may lead to or be indicative of a software exploit occurring. (M1050: Exploit Protection)
- Safeguard 13.10: Performing Application Layer Filtering: Perform application layer filtering. Example implementations include a filtering proxy, application layer firewall, or gateway.
Source link
lol
MS-ISAC ADVISORY NUMBER: 2024-083 DATE(S) ISSUED: 07/22/2024 OVERVIEW: A vulnerability has been discovered in Cisco Secure Email Gateway that could allow for remote code execution. Cisco Secure Email Gateway is an email security product that uses signature analysis and machine learning to identify and block malicious emails before they reach recipients inboxes. Successful exploitation could…
Recent Posts
- Windows 10 KB5046714 update fixes bug preventing app uninstalls
- Eight Key Takeaways From Kyndryl’s First Investor Day
- QNAP pulls buggy QTS firmware causing widespread NAS issues
- N-able Exec: ‘Cybersecurity And Compliance Are A Team Sport’
- Hackers breach US firm over Wi-Fi from Russia in ‘Nearest Neighbor Attack’