Multiple Vulnerabilities in LenelS2 NetBox Could Allow for Arbitrary Code Execution


MS-ISAC ADVISORY NUMBER:

2024-063

DATE(S) ISSUED:

05/30/2024

OVERVIEW:

Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in LenelS2 NetBox, the most severe of which could allow for arbitrary code execution. LenelS2 NetBox is a browser-based enterprise access control and event monitoring system designed for deployments with demanding security requirements. Successful exploitation of the most severe of these vulnerabilities could allow for arbitrary code execution in the context of the affected user account. Depending on the privileges associated with the user account, an attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. Users whose accounts are configured to have less rights on the system could be less impacted than those who operate with administrative user rights.

THREAT INTELLIGENCE:

There are currently no reports of the vulnerabilities being exploited in the wild.

SYSTEMS AFFECTED:

  • All versions prior to 5.6.2

RISK:

Government:

Large and medium government entitiesHIGH

Small governmentMEDIUM

Businesses:

Large and medium business entitiesHIGH

Small business entitiesMEDIUM

TECHNICAL SUMMARY:

Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in LenelS2 NetBox, the most severe of which could allow for arbitrary code execution. Details of these vulnerabilities are as follows:

Tactic: Initial Access (TA0001):
Technique: Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190):

  • Use of Hard-Coded Password vulnerability exists which could allow an attacker to bypass authentication requirements (CVE-2024-2420).
  • Improper Neutralization of Special Elements Used In An OS Command – Unauthenticated remote code execution exists which could allow an attacker to execute malicious commands with elevated permissions (CVE-2024-2421).
  • Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters In A Command (‘Argument Injection’) – Authenticated remote code execution exists which could allow an attacker to execute malicious commands. (CVE-2024-2422).

Successful exploitation of the most severe of these vulnerabilities could allow for arbitrary code execution in the context of the affected user account. Depending on the privileges associated with the user account, an attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. Users whose accounts are configured to have less rights on the system could be less impacted than those who operate with administrative user rights.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

We recommend the following actions be taken:

  • Apply appropriate updates provided by Carrier to vulnerable systems immediately after appropriate testing. (M1051: Update Software)
    o Safeguard 7.1: Establish and Maintain a Vulnerability Management Process: Establish and maintain a documented vulnerability management process for enterprise assets. Review and update documentation annually, or when significant enterprise changes occur that could impact this Safeguard.
    o Safeguard 7.2: Establish and Maintain a Remediation Process: Establish and maintain a risk-based remediation strategy documented in a remediation process, with monthly, or more frequent, reviews.
    o Safeguard 7.4: Perform Automated Application Patch Management: Perform application updates on enterprise assets through automated patch management on a monthly, or more frequent, basis.
    o Safeguard 7.5: Perform Automated Vulnerability Scans of Internal Enterprise Assets: Perform automated vulnerability scans of internal enterprise assets on a quarterly, or more frequent, basis. Conduct both authenticated and unauthenticated scans, using a SCAP-compliant vulnerability scanning tool.
    o Safeguard 7.7: Remediate Detected Vulnerabilities: Remediate detected vulnerabilities in software through processes and tooling on a monthly, or more frequent, basis, based on the remediation process.
    o Safeguard 12.1: Ensure Network Infrastructure is Up-to-Date: Ensure network infrastructure is kept up-to-date. Example implementations include running the latest stable release of software and/or using currently supported network-as-a-service (NaaS) offerings. Review software versions monthly, or more frequently, to verify software support.

  • Apply the Principle of Least Privilege to all systems and services. Run all software as a non-privileged user (one without administrative privileges) to diminish the effects of a successful attack. (M1026: Privileged Account Management)
    o Safeguard 4.7: Manage Default Accounts on Enterprise Assets and Software: Manage default accounts on enterprise assets and software, such as root, administrator, and other pre-configured vendor accounts. Example implementations can include: disabling default accounts or making them unusable.
    o Safeguard 5.5: Establish and Maintain an Inventory of Service Accounts: Establish and maintain an inventory of service accounts. The inventory, at a minimum, must contain department owner, review date, and purpose. Perform service account reviews to validate that all active accounts are authorized, on a recurring schedule at a minimum quarterly, or more frequently.

  • Vulnerability scanning is used to find potentially exploitable software vulnerabilities to remediate them. (M1016: Vulnerability Scanning)
    o Safeguard 16.13: Conduct Application Penetration Testing: Conduct application penetration testing. For critical applications, authenticated penetration testing is better suited to finding business logic vulnerabilities than code scanning and automated security testing. Penetration testing relies on the skill of the tester to manually manipulate an application as an authenticated and unauthenticated user.

  • Architect sections of the network to isolate critical systems, functions, or resources. Use physical and logical segmentation to prevent access to potentially sensitive systems and information. Use a DMZ to contain any internet-facing services that should not be exposed from the internal network. Configure separate virtual private cloud (VPC) instances to isolate critical cloud systems. (M1030: Network Segmentation)
    o Safeguard 12.2: Establish and Maintain a Secure Network Architecture: Establish and maintain a secure network architecture. A secure network architecture must address segmentation, least
    privilege, and availability, at a minimum.

  • Use capabilities to detect and block conditions that may lead to or be indicative of a software exploit occurring. (M1050: Exploit Protection)
    o Safeguard 10.5: Enable Anti-Exploitation Features: Enable anti-exploitation features on enterprise assets and software, where possible, such as Microsoft® Data Execution Prevention (DEP), Windows® Defender Exploit Guard (WDEG), or Apple® System Integrity Protection (SIP) and Gatekeeper™.



Source link
lol

MS-ISAC ADVISORY NUMBER: 2024-063 DATE(S) ISSUED: 05/30/2024 OVERVIEW: Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in LenelS2 NetBox, the most severe of which could allow for arbitrary code execution. LenelS2 NetBox is a browser-based enterprise access control and event monitoring system designed for deployments with demanding security requirements. Successful exploitation of the most severe of these vulnerabilities…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *